{"id":15905,"date":"2023-09-22T15:24:16","date_gmt":"2023-09-22T19:24:16","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/notes.math.ca\/article\/a-jargon-minimal-counting-proof-of-sylows-first-theorem\/"},"modified":"2023-10-16T11:31:16","modified_gmt":"2023-10-16T15:31:16","slug":"a-jargon-minimal-counting-proof-of-sylows-first-theorem","status":"publish","type":"article","link":"https:\/\/notes.math.ca\/fr\/article\/a-jargon-minimal-counting-proof-of-sylows-first-theorem\/","title":{"rendered":"A jargon-minimal counting proof of Sylow\u2019s first theorem"},"content":{"rendered":"<h4><strong>Abstract<\/strong><\/h4>\n<p>We present a short proof of Sylow\u2019s famous \u2018First Theorem.\u2019 &nbsp;Stripped to its essentials, the proof\u2014attributed to Wielandt&nbsp; (1959)\u2014relies only on basic concepts (equivalence relations and divisibility). Whereas most textbook proofs invoke plenty of group-theoretic jargon (stabilizers, conjugacy &nbsp;classes, &nbsp;etc.), &nbsp;this &nbsp;one &nbsp;avoids &nbsp;all &nbsp;that, &nbsp;stands &nbsp;alone, &nbsp;and fits on a page.<\/p>\n<p>A (binary) million years ago, Helmut Wielandt published an appealing counting proof [3] of Sylow\u2019s First Theorem.&nbsp; Stripped to its bare essentials, it requires surprisingly little group theory and ought to be better known. The version below lends itself to an hour or so in a classroom with second- or third-year university math enthusiasts.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Theorem (\u2018Sylow\u2019s First\u2019) <\/strong><em>If <span class=\"wp-katex-eq\" data-display=\"false\">p<\/span> is a prime, <span class=\"wp-katex-eq\" data-display=\"false\">r<\/span> is an integer coprime to <span class=\"wp-katex-eq\" data-display=\"false\">p<\/span>, and <span class=\"wp-katex-eq\" data-display=\"false\">G<\/span> is a group <\/em><em>of order <span class=\"wp-katex-eq\" data-display=\"false\">p^{alpha}r<\/span>, then <span class=\"wp-katex-eq\" data-display=\"false\">G<\/span> contains a(t least one) subgroup of order <span class=\"wp-katex-eq\" data-display=\"false\">p^{alpha}<\/span>.<\/em><\/p>\n<p><em>Proof. <\/em>Let <em><span class=\"wp-katex-eq\" data-display=\"false\">mathcal{S}<\/span><\/em> denote the family of all sub<em><strong>sets <\/strong><\/em>of <em><span class=\"wp-katex-eq\" data-display=\"false\">G<\/span><\/em> of size<em> <span class=\"wp-katex-eq\" data-display=\"false\">p^{alpha}<\/span>, <\/em>and write<em> <span class=\"wp-katex-eq\" data-display=\"false\">mathcal{S}={A_1,A_2,ldots,A_n}<\/span>. <\/em>We shall argue that at least one member of <em><span class=\"wp-katex-eq\" data-display=\"false\">mathcal{S}<\/span><\/em><em>&nbsp;<\/em>is a group\u2014indeed, is a subgroup of <em><span class=\"wp-katex-eq\" data-display=\"false\">G<\/span>.<\/em><\/p>\n<p>It\u2019s convenient to know that <span class=\"wp-katex-eq\" data-display=\"false\">p<\/span><em>&nbsp;<\/em>and <span class=\"wp-katex-eq\" data-display=\"false\">n<\/span><em>&nbsp;<\/em>are coprime, so we first establish this fact. We have<\/p>\n<span class=\"wp-katex-eq\" data-display=\"false\">n=binom{p^{alpha}r}{p^{alpha}}=frac{p^{alpha}r(p^{alpha}r-1)(p^{alpha}r-2)cdots(p^{alpha}r-(p^{alpha}-1))}{p^{alpha}cdot1cdot 2cdot~cdots~cdot(p^{alpha}-1)}=rprodlimits_{k=1}^{p^{alpha}-1}frac{p^{alpha}r-k}{k}.<\/span>\n<p>Consider the factors <span class=\"wp-katex-eq\" data-display=\"false\">frac{p^{alpha}r-k}{k}<\/span>. If <span class=\"wp-katex-eq\" data-display=\"false\">pnmid k<\/span>, then <span class=\"wp-katex-eq\" data-display=\"false\">pnmid (p^{alpha}r-k)<\/span>. On the other hand, if <span class=\"wp-katex-eq\" data-display=\"false\">p,|, k<\/span>, then <span class=\"wp-katex-eq\" data-display=\"false\">k=p^{beta}s<\/span> for some integer <span class=\"wp-katex-eq\" data-display=\"false\">beta<\/span> with <span class=\"wp-katex-eq\" data-display=\"false\">1leqbeta&lt;alpha<\/span> and <span class=\"wp-katex-eq\" data-display=\"false\">pnmid s<\/span>. So here, we have<\/p>\n<span class=\"wp-katex-eq\" data-display=\"false\">frac{p^{alpha}r-k}{k}=frac{p^{beta}(p^{alpha-beta}r-s)}{p^{beta}s}=frac{p^{alpha-beta}r-s}{s},<\/span>\n<p>and <span class=\"wp-katex-eq\" data-display=\"false\">pnmid p^{alpha-beta}r-s<\/span> (for otherwise, <span class=\"wp-katex-eq\" data-display=\"false\">p,|, s<\/span>). In either case, <span class=\"wp-katex-eq\" data-display=\"false\">p<\/span> fails to divide each factor <span class=\"wp-katex-eq\" data-display=\"false\">frac{p^{alpha}r-k}{k}<\/span>, and thus we see that <span class=\"wp-katex-eq\" data-display=\"false\">pnmid n<\/span>.<\/p>\n<p>Now if <span class=\"wp-katex-eq\" data-display=\"false\">xin G<\/span> and <span class=\"wp-katex-eq\" data-display=\"false\">A_iinmathcal{S}<\/span>, then the set <span class=\"wp-katex-eq\" data-display=\"false\">A_{i}x<\/span> also contains <span class=\"wp-katex-eq\" data-display=\"false\">p^{alpha}<\/span> elements (for the map <span class=\"wp-katex-eq\" data-display=\"false\">A_ito A_{i}x<\/span> given by <span class=\"wp-katex-eq\" data-display=\"false\">amapsto ax<\/span> is injective). Hence, <span class=\"wp-katex-eq\" data-display=\"false\">A_{i}x=A_{j}<\/span> for some <span class=\"wp-katex-eq\" data-display=\"false\">jin{1,ldots,n}<\/span>. Let us define a relation <span class=\"wp-katex-eq\" data-display=\"false\">sim<\/span> on <span class=\"wp-katex-eq\" data-display=\"false\">mathcal{S}<\/span> by<\/p>\n<span class=\"wp-katex-eq\" data-display=\"false\">A_isim A_j Longleftrightarrow A_{i}x=A_{j} text{ for some } xin G.<\/span>\n<p>Using the group axioms for <span class=\"wp-katex-eq\" data-display=\"false\">G<\/span>, it&rsquo;s easy to see that <span class=\"wp-katex-eq\" data-display=\"false\">sim<\/span> is an equivalence relation. Since <span class=\"wp-katex-eq\" data-display=\"false\">pnmid n<\/span>, at least one equivalence class <span class=\"wp-katex-eq\" data-display=\"false\">mathcal{C}<\/span>&nbsp; of <span class=\"wp-katex-eq\" data-display=\"false\">sim<\/span> contains some <span class=\"wp-katex-eq\" data-display=\"false\">q<\/span> sets <span class=\"wp-katex-eq\" data-display=\"false\">A_i<\/span> with <span class=\"wp-katex-eq\" data-display=\"false\">pnmid q<\/span>; say <span class=\"wp-katex-eq\" data-display=\"false\">mathcal{C}={A_1,A_2,ldots,A_q}<\/span> (relabelling the <span class=\"wp-katex-eq\" data-display=\"false\">A_i<\/span>&lsquo;s as necessary).<\/p>\n<p>Let <span class=\"wp-katex-eq\" data-display=\"false\">H={xin Gcolon A_{1}x=A_{1}}<\/span>; one easily verifies that <span class=\"wp-katex-eq\" data-display=\"false\">H<\/span> is a subgroup of <span class=\"wp-katex-eq\" data-display=\"false\">G<\/span>&#8212;write <span class=\"wp-katex-eq\" data-display=\"false\">h<\/span> for its order. For <span class=\"wp-katex-eq\" data-display=\"false\">x,yin G<\/span>, observe that<\/p>\n<span class=\"wp-katex-eq\" data-display=\"false\"> A_{1}x=A_{1}y Leftrightarrow A_{1}xy^{-1}=A_{1} Leftrightarrow xy^{-1}in H Leftrightarrow Hxy^{-1}= H Leftrightarrow Hx=Hy; <\/span>\n<p>therefore, <span class=\"wp-katex-eq\" data-display=\"false\">A_{1}xneq A_{1}y<\/span> if and only if <span class=\"wp-katex-eq\" data-display=\"false\">Hxneq Hy<\/span>. It follows from this equivalence and the definition of <span class=\"wp-katex-eq\" data-display=\"false\">mathcal{C}<\/span> that <span class=\"wp-katex-eq\" data-display=\"false\">mathcal{C} <\/span>&lsquo;s order <span class=\"wp-katex-eq\" data-display=\"false\">q<\/span> coincides with the number of distinct (right) cosets of <span class=\"wp-katex-eq\" data-display=\"false\">H<\/span> in <span class=\"wp-katex-eq\" data-display=\"false\">G<\/span>; i.e., <span class=\"wp-katex-eq\" data-display=\"false\">q=p^{alpha}r\/h<\/span>, or <span class=\"wp-katex-eq\" data-display=\"false\">h=p^{alpha}r\/q<\/span>. But since <span class=\"wp-katex-eq\" data-display=\"false\">pnmid q<\/span>, this implies that <span class=\"wp-katex-eq\" data-display=\"false\">q,|, r<\/span>, so that <span class=\"wp-katex-eq\" data-display=\"false\">hgeq p^{alpha}<\/span>.&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>To see the reverse inequality, consider an element <span class=\"wp-katex-eq\" data-display=\"false\">ain A_1<\/span>. The definition of <span class=\"wp-katex-eq\" data-display=\"false\">H<\/span> implies that the (left) coset <span class=\"wp-katex-eq\" data-display=\"false\">aH<\/span> is a subset of <span class=\"wp-katex-eq\" data-display=\"false\">A_1<\/span>; whence,<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"wp-katex-eq\" data-display=\"false\">h=|H|=|aH|leq |A_1|=p^{alpha}<\/span>,<\/p>\n<p>and it now follows that <span class=\"wp-katex-eq\" data-display=\"false\">h=p^{alpha}<\/span>. Therefore, the subgroup <span class=\"wp-katex-eq\" data-display=\"false\">H<\/span> of <span class=\"wp-katex-eq\" data-display=\"false\">G<\/span> is indeed a member of <span class=\"wp-katex-eq\" data-display=\"false\">mathcal{S}<\/span>.&nbsp;<\/p>\n<span class=\"wp-katex-eq\" data-display=\"false\">Box<\/span>\n<p><strong>Remark <\/strong>Other authors\u2014e.g., [1, 2]\u2014have presented Wielandt\u2019s proof; Professor Petrich (see below) distilled it particularly nicely on one chalkboard.<\/p>\n<h2>In memoriam<\/h2>\n<p>Submitted in honour of <strong>Mario Petrich (1932\u20132021)<\/strong>, who showed me (and the rest of the class) this proof at Simon Fraser University in 1986.<\/p>\n<h2>References<\/h2>\n<p>[1]&nbsp; I.N. Herstein, <em>Topics in Algebra<\/em>, Second edition, Xerox College Publishing, Lexington MA, 1975.<\/p>\n<p>[2]&nbsp; I. Martin Isaacs, <em>Algebra. A Graduate Course<\/em>, Brooks\/Cole, Pacific Grove CA, 1994.<\/p>\n<p>[3]&nbsp; Helmut Wielandt, Ein Beweis f\u00fcr die Existenz der Sylowgruppen, <em>Arch. Math. <\/em>(Basel), <strong>10 <\/strong>(1959), 401\u2013402.<\/p>\n<p><strong>AMS (MOS) Subject Classifications<\/strong>: 20D20, 05A10, 00A05, 11-01<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":11,"template":"","section":[468],"keyword":[467,466,136],"class_list":["post-15905","article","type-article","status-publish","hentry","section-submissions","keyword-finite-groups","keyword-finite-groups-and-orders-of-their-subgroups","keyword-research"],"toolset-meta":{"author-4-info":{"author-4-surname":{"type":"textfield","raw":""},"author-4-given-names":{"type":"textfield","raw":""},"author-4-honorific":{"type":"textfield","raw":""},"author-4-institution":{"type":"textfield","raw":""},"author-4-email":{"type":"email","raw":""},"author-4-cms-role":{"type":"textfield","raw":""}},"author-3-info":{"author-3-surname":{"type":"textfield","raw":""},"author-3-given-names":{"type":"textfield","raw":""},"author-3-honorific":{"type":"textfield","raw":""},"author-3-institution":{"type":"textfield","raw":""},"author-3-email":{"type":"email","raw":""},"author-3-cms-role":{"type":"textfield","raw":""}},"author-2-info":{"author-2-surname":{"type":"textfield","raw":""},"author-2-given-names":{"type":"textfield","raw":""},"author-2-honorific":{"type":"textfield","raw":""},"author-2-institution":{"type":"textfield","raw":""},"author-2-email":{"type":"email","raw":""},"author-2-cms-role":{"type":"textfield","raw":""}},"author-info":{"author-surname":{"type":"textfield","raw":"Kayll"},"author-given-names":{"type":"textfield","raw":"P. Mark"},"author-honorific":{"type":"textfield","raw":""},"author-email":{"type":"email","raw":"mark.kayll@umontana.edu"},"author-institution":{"type":"textfield","raw":"University of Montana, Missoula, MT, USA"},"author-cms-role":{"type":"textfield","raw":""}},"unknown":{"downloadable-pdf":{"type":"file","raw":"https:\/\/notes.math.ca\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/09\/7-A-jargon-minimal-counting-proof-of-Sylows-first-theorem-\u2013-CMS-Notes-1.pdf","attachment_id":16208},"article-toc-weight":{"type":"numeric","raw":"7"},"author-surname":{"type":"textfield","raw":"Kayll"},"author-given-names":{"type":"textfield","raw":"P. Mark"}}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/notes.math.ca\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/article\/15905","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/notes.math.ca\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/article"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/notes.math.ca\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/article"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/notes.math.ca\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/11"}],"version-history":[{"count":39,"href":"https:\/\/notes.math.ca\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/article\/15905\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":16120,"href":"https:\/\/notes.math.ca\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/article\/15905\/revisions\/16120"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/notes.math.ca\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=15905"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"section","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/notes.math.ca\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/section?post=15905"},{"taxonomy":"keyword","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/notes.math.ca\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/keyword?post=15905"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}